Mayuka Aikawa vs Youna Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Aikawa perform on second serves compared to Kim? Aikawa wins 40.93% of points on second serve, while Kim secures 46.88%, giving Kim an edge in this area.
• Recently, in return games, Kim has a slight advantage, winning 45.45% of points on opponents' second serves. Aikawa trails closely with 43.91%.
• In first serve returns, Kim holds a more significant lead, claiming 38.82% over Aikawa's 31.86%.
• Who handles breakpoint pressure better? Kim saves 54.17% of breakpoints faced, outperforming Aikawa's 47.77%.
• Looking at overall performance, Aikawa has a slight edge with a 51.85% match win rate over the last year, while Kim achieved 42.86%.
• Aikawa excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Kim's performance is consistent on hard courts at 35%.
• Aikawa navigates Challengers/ITF events with a 57.58% match win rate, surpassing Kim's 40% in similar settings.
• Aikawa's opponents have been slightly tougher, with an average rank of 345.19 compared to Kim's opponents, who average 357.14.
• Kim shows resilience in deciding sets, winning 67% of these matches, whereas Aikawa wins 57%.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion, Aikawa takes advantage of 34.97% of these opportunities against Kim's 21.05%, a critical stat for in-game betting.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of both players, Kim holds a superior record in critical areas such as second serve performance and breakpoint pressure management.

While Aikawa demonstrates a resilient performance on indoor hard surfaces and converts breakpoints more effectively, Kim's consistency in return games and the ability to handle deciding sets may prove advantageous.

Despite Aikawa's overall higher match win rate and experience against slightly stronger opponents, Kim's strengths in high-pressure moments suggest a compelling matchup.

Considering all factors, Kim appears more equipped to secure a victory in the upcoming match, given their pressure performance and consistency in returns.